Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-06-25 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than Honor 50 Pro, getting a 78.8 score against 77. The Google Pixel 3a is a incredibly older and a bit thicker cellphone than the Honor 50 Pro, but Google could make it noticeably lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The Honor 50 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little worse pixels number in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1236 x 2676 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Honor 50 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Honor 50 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.