Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2015-01-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.96 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Gray and Red |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 185.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than LG G Flex 2, getting a 78.8 score against 75.2. The Google Pixel 3a body is incredibly newer, a bit lighter and thinner than LG G Flex 2. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and LG G Flex 2 has Android 5.0.
LG G Flex 2 features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G Flex 2 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The LG G Flex 2 counts with a brighter display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little lower pixels density and a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a superior camera than LG G Flex 2, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a worse 12.2 mega-pixels resolution. LG G Flex 2 counts with a little bit better memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 128 GB.
The LG G Flex 2 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the Google Pixel 3a one.
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit more expensive than the LG G Flex 2, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.