Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-11-09 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than the LG G7 Fit, getting a 78.8 score against 77. These devices come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version. Even though the Google Pixel 3a and LG G7 Fit were released only a few months apart, Google Pixel 3a's design is just a little bit lighter but just a little thicker.
LG G7 Fit features a better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite larger display, more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 3120 resolution. Google Pixel 3a has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 3a also has a larger number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit's camera is just as good as the Google Pixel 3a one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a smaller back camera sensor providing a lower image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, it also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The LG G7 Fit has a much better memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit counts with a battery duration that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Google Pixel 3a.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.