Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-06-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Although the LG G7 ThinQ is older and a bit heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's body is still a little thinner.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. LG G7 ThinQ features a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG G7 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with a much better resolution and better video frame rates.
LG G7 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to Google Pixel 3a's battery duration.
The LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.