Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. The LG G8X ThinQ is a way heavier and a bit thicker device than the Google Pixel 3a. These phones come with Android operating system, but the LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
LG G8X ThinQ has a display that is very similar to the Google Pixel 3a one, because although the LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit larger screen. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with a lower 12 mega pixels resolution, they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same aperture.
The LG G8X ThinQ features superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The LG G8X ThinQ is more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.