Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-11-06 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. Even though the LG K92 is newer than Google Pixel 3a, it's a little thicker and a lot heavier. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Google Pixel 3a features a bit sharper screen than LG K92, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a bit better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The LG K92 features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG K92 also has more RAM memory.
The LG K92 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same video frame rates and the same diafragm aperture, the LG K92 also has a much better 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
The LG K92 features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG K92 has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Although LG K92 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.