Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mirror black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is slightly better than LG Q70's global score of 77.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has newer 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features and better performance. The Google Pixel 3a is a way lighter phone than the LG Q70, but both are 0.32inches thick.
The LG Q70's processing unit is very similar to Google Pixel 3a's processor, both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Google Pixel 3a has a slightly better looking screen than LG Q70, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
LG Q70 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG Q70 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Q70 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Q70 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The LG Q70 has improved battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.