Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's global score of 76.7. The Google Pixel 3a construction is lighter and a bit thinner than LG Stylo 6, although it was released just 13 months before. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Google Pixel 3a features just a bit better screen than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Stylo 6 also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Stylo 6 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 3a takes just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a lower 12.2 mega-pixels resolution back camera, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 3a also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.