Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older and just a little heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a, but LG was able to build it a little thinner anyway.
LG V30S ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little greater screen pixel density, a bit larger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography and videos and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.