Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a general score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. LG V35 ThinQ is an older and a little bit heavier cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but LG managed to build it a little bit thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a little better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little bit bigger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution and a bigger aperture to take better photography in low-light situations.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG V35 ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.