Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a, with an 81.2 score against 78.8. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. LG V40 ThinQ's construction is heavier but just a little thinner than the Google Pixel 3a, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit better pixels density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG V40 ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V40 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V40 ThinQ has just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V40 ThinQ takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a worse resolution back camera, a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a smaller camera sensor, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and video.
LG V40 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.