Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Google Pixel 3a, having an 87.6 score against 78.8. These phones use the same Android 11 OS, so they should give you all the same OS features. The LG V60 ThinQ is a newer cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a, but it's noticeably heavier and just a bit thicker. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little lower 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a same size aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.