Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. LG Velvet is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but it's also heavier. The LG Velvet features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Velvet also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density. The LG Velvet has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the LG Velvet also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor. LG Velvet counts with a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
LG Velvet costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.