Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-10-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Google Pixel 3a, having a overall score of 91.2 against 78.8. Even though the LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 3a, it is a lot heavier and much thicker. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has the previous 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better looking screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The LG Wing has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG Wing counts with a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM. LG Wing has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity. The LG Wing takes greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same aperture, the LG Wing also has better 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much bigger sensor.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some money, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.