Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than Google Pixel 3a, having a global score of 92.8 against 78.8. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro body is much newer and a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than Google Pixel 3a. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a newer 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a display that's just as good as the screen in Google Pixel 3a, because although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger screen. Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much better video definition and a back camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.