Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's score of 78.5. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version. The Google Pixel 3a is a way older and just a little thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, but Google was able to make it lighter anyway.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit worse display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3a features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.