Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. These devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a more recent 13 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, so it offers a couple additional features and performance enhancements. Although Motorola Edge 40 Pro is way newer than Google Pixel 3a, it's noticeably heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen. The Google Pixel 3a features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.