Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having an 86.3 score against 78.8. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a, but it's extremely heavier. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, so it counts with some additional features.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3a features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a way bigger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a back facing camera with a way better 50 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.