Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is noticeably newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, although it's noticeably heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, so it provides the user a lot of extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Google Pixel 3a features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better video frame rate, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments and a much larger camera sensor taking way better quality photographs.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.