Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a 79.3 score against 78.8. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) body is newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, but it is a little thicker and heavier. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with much more storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with improved battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) features a better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a bigger aperture and a back camera with a much better resolution.
Although Moto G Stylus (2021) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.