Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), getting a global score of 78.8 against 76. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Google Pixel 3a has 11 version while Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13 version. Google Pixel 3a is an older cellphone than the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), but it is somewhat thinner and way lighter anyway.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per display inch. The Google Pixel 3a has a way better hardware performance than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) shoots better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a way better 50 MP resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a way better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.