Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-02-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has an overall score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus's 76.1 global score. The Google Pixel 3a construction is a little thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G7 Plus, even when they were released only a few months apart. These phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a little bit better display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2220 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G7 Plus. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Moto G7 Plus features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G7 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G7 Plus takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G7 Plus also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light situations and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Moto G7 Plus's battery life is very similar to Google Pixel 3a's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.