Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with a global score of 78.8 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 3a design is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but thicker than the Moto Z Force. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Google Pixel 3a features a bit superior processor than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3a also has a larger number of cores. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a quite greater display density.
The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Moto Z Force captures slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Moto Z Force also has a way better 21 MP resolution camera.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3a is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.