Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a 78.8 score against 76.4. Although Google Pixel 3a is somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, it's a little lighter and a lot newer. The Google Pixel 3a counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Google Pixel 3a also has 4 more CPU cores.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a just a bit greater screen density. Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same aperture, the Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a much more megapixels camera.
Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.