Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a little bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a global score of 78.8 against 77.4. Google Pixel 3a's construction is newer than Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's thicker and just a little heavier. Moto Z2 Force Edition features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little better display density.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Google Pixel 3a captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 3a also has a larger camera sensor, a camera with more megapixels and a bigger aperture.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.