Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has an overall score of 79.8, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's global score of 78.8. These devices have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features. Even though Motorola One Hyper is a better phone than Google Pixel 3a, we must note that it's also noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per screen inch. The Motorola One Hyper's CPU is just as good as Google Pixel 3a's CPU, they have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The Motorola One Hyper has better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper takes much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Hyper, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.