Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a score of 80.7 against 78.8. Despite being the best device in this review, the Motorola One Vision is a somewhat heavier and just a little thicker device than the Google Pixel 3a. The Motorola One Vision has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3a and the Motorola One Vision feature quite similar displays, because although the Motorola One Vision has a little bit lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2520. The Motorola One Vision takes better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a back camera with way more mega pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture for better photography and videos in low-light environments.
The Motorola One Vision has a very superior memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Vision has just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.