Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Motorola One Zoom design is just a little thicker and notably heavier than the Google Pixel 3a. The Motorola One Zoom's processing unit is just as good as Google Pixel 3a's processor, both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount.
The Google Pixel 3a has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One Zoom, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2220 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher screen density. Motorola One Zoom has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 128 GB.
The Motorola One Zoom counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Motorola One Zoom also has a much larger back camera sensor, a back camera with much more MP and a larger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One Zoom features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although Motorola One Zoom is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One Zoom, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.