Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should give all the same OS features. Motorola razr (2020) is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a, but it is also way heavier.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) takes better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low-light images.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.