Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-11-09 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | -- |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is just a bit better than Nokia X100's score of 77.3. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Google Pixel 3a's body is lighter and thinner than the Nokia X100, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Nokia X100 features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia X100 also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 3a features a little sharper display than Nokia X100, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2220px resolution, it also counts with a quite better display pixel density.
Google Pixel 3a captures better pictures and videos than Nokia X100, although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution. The Nokia X100 has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Nokia X100 counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4470mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.