Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | -- |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. These devices use the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference in that aspect. The Nokia XR20 construction is incredibly newer, but way thicker and incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 3a.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little worse count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Nokia XR20 counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 captures better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and the same aperture, the Nokia XR20 also has better 60 fps video frame rates, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.