Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 is slightly better than Google Pixel 3a, with a 79.7 score against 78.8. Although OPPO Find X2 is a lot heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, it's a little thinner and also newer. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 has older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
OPPO Find X2 counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a little bit greater screen pixel density, a bigger display and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Find X2 captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, better video frame rate, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.