Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting a global score of 78.8 against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version. The Google Pixel 3a design is somewhat lighter than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it is just a little thicker and was released just 13 months before.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a larger display. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger aperture.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 34 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.