Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a global score of 83.1, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. OPPO Find X2 Pro's construction is newer, but notably heavier and a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a. These phones come with Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px, a larger screen and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 42 percent more battery capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, better video frame rates and a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.