Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than the Galaxy A15 5G, having a overall score of 78.8 against 77.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14 version. Google Pixel 3a's body is way lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A15 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Google Pixel 3a features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same video definition and a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels. The Galaxy A15 5G has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.