Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a global score of 79.9 against 78.8. Galaxy A25 5G's body is way newer, but notably heavier and a bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A25 5G has a more recent 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite lower pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with much more storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and images, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.