Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3a, getting a global score of 79.4 against 78.8. Galaxy A35 5G is a notably heavier phone than the Google Pixel 3a, but they have the same thickness. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A35 5G has a newer 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, so it gives a couple nice extra features and optimized performance.
Google Pixel 3a has a very superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 67% more battery size. The Galaxy A35 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A35 5G also has a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.