Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but it's heavier and a little thicker. The Google Pixel 3a features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2220, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A52 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much bigger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with much more memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A52 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.