Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Google Pixel 3a, with a overall score of 91.3 against 78.8. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance enhancements. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone than Google Pixel 3a, but it's a little bit thicker and way heavier.
The Google Pixel 3a features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way larger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A52 5G has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 50 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.