Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting a global score of 91.1 against 78.8. Galaxy A52s's construction is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, but it is much heavier and a bit thicker. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A52s has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has 2 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 3a has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little higher pixel number per inch in the screen. The Galaxy A52s has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy A52s shoots much better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same 30 fps video frame rate and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.