Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a score of 92.9, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is newer, but much heavier and just a little bit thicker than Google Pixel 3a.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen pixel density. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.