Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-07 | 2017-04-07 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 3.04 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Blue and Gold |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the Galaxy C7 Pro, having a 78.8 score against 78.4. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 3a has the older 11 version and Galaxy C7 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. Google Pixel 3a's body is notably newer and somewhat lighter than Galaxy C7 Pro's, but it is thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a. They have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a little higher 1080 x 2220 resolution.
Google Pixel 3a captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video.
Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy C7 Pro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. The Galaxy C7 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 10% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.