Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has an overall score of 84.6, which is slightly better than the Google Pixel 3a's overall score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy F23's body is a lot newer and a lot lighter, but also a little thicker than the Google Pixel 3a. Both phones in this review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy F23 has newer 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version.
Galaxy F23 has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Google Pixel 3a counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy F23, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220px, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy F23 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage. Galaxy F23 has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Google Pixel 3a takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy F23, although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.