Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 overall score. Both devices in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is newer than Google Pixel 3a, it is extremely heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy F62 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has less cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 133% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy F62 features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a way larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.