Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a score of 78.9, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 global score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The Galaxy M20 construction is just a little thicker and much heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M20. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Galaxy M20 features a superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3a shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution, a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.