Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is better than the Google Pixel 3a, getting an 89 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 construction is just a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, and they were released only a couple of months apart. The Google Pixel 3a features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2220 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels density.
Galaxy Note10 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 takes just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a lesser megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have the same sensor size, the Galaxy Note10 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.