Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's general score of 78.8. Galaxy S10 Lite's body has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3a, but it is way heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3a has a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and faster video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.