Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.19 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and lighter cellphone than Google Pixel 3a. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version, counting with lots of additional features and improved performance.
The Google Pixel 3a features a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 has a better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a way better video quality, a much better resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 counts with superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.