Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-07 | -- |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 5.19 ounces | -- |
| Black, Purple and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 186.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Google Pixel 3a, with a 90.7 score against 78.8. Both devices we compare here have Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version while Google Pixel 3a has Android 11, providing the user lots of additional features. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a incredibly thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a.
Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better display than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a quite greater display density, a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a larger display. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a really superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 200 MP resolution back camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light captures and video and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.