Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 186.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2220 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 615 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Google Pixel 3a, getting an 88.5 score against 78.8. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a, but it is heavier. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a little higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Flip takes slightly better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video definition, they both have a 0.39 inches sensor and a same size camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3a. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.